• Germany Invests in Hydrogen Technology for Renewable Storage, Vehicles February 6, 2012
    The tanks look like they could hold propane, gasoline or any other form of conventional energy. […]
  • NLP Solar Sales Training Live Webinar February 8th & 9th February 6, 2012
    […]
  • Ten Clean Energy Stocks for 2012: 10 Percent More than Other Top-10 lists February 6, 2012
    Maybe it was because Seeking Alpha did not carry my annual list of 10 Clean Energy Stocks for 2012 this year, but no one seems to have noticed that there were actually 11 stocks in the list. Call it the Spinal Tap of top-ten lists. […]
  • Solar Fred's 7 Keys to Why People Share Marketing Materials on the Web February 6, 2012
    What triggers you to press one of those share buttons above, or email this post — or any website link — to a colleague or friend? Think about it. Because the keys to knowing why people share things are the keys to so-called "viral" solar marketing. Before we get to why we share, let's talk about how we used to share and how we share […]
  • Asia Report: India Sees 52 Percent Rise in Investments February 6, 2012
    The year 2011 may be remembered in clean energy circles as the moment when India became a major player across several industries. […]
  • Clean Energy: How Much Hot Air? February 3, 2012
    NewScientist’s January 28 issue is likely to unsettle clean energy advocates — but it is worth the read. The cover article, “Power paradox: Clean might not be green forever,” posits that even renewable energy can warm the planet, and eventually change climate, if we continue to ratchet up power production to serve our ever […]
  • Suntech, DuPont to Collab on Solar Backsheets, Supply Chain February 3, 2012
    It's easy to think about modules as singular units of power output, but the reality is that they are a collection of diverse components, each with influence over the end system's total cost and performance. For DuPont, its focus is of course on the materials side, from metallization pastes used to form contacts on the solar cell, to backsheet mater […]
  • DOE's Untold Impact on Solar February 3, 2012
    The Obama Administration's $60 billion Loan Guarantee Program (LGP) for renewable energy is considered a failure because of Solyndra, Beacon Power, and potential 2012 bankruptcies. What is not well known is that 75 percent of the program's deployed funds went to relatively low risk power plants that will catapult the U.S. to a leadership role in th […]
  • Wind Power to the South: AEP Contracts to Lower Electricity Costs February 3, 2012
    In a series of deals the investor-owned utility says is good for consumers' wallets, American Electric Power subsidiary Southwestern Electric Power Co. (SWEPCO) recently signed long-term power purchase agreements for a total of 358.65 MW of capacity from wind projects in Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas. […]
  • Miasolé Claims 17 Percent Efficient CIGS Device, 14 Percent In Production February 2, 2012
    Miasolé says it has created a 17.3 percent "champion" thin-film copper-indium-gallium-selenide (CIGS) solar photovoltaic device, results obtained in its own labs and not (yet) independently verified. […]
  • Offshore Wind One Step Closer to Reality in the Mid-Atlantic February 2, 2012
    Today the Obama administration moved forward with plans to develop the enormous offshore wind energy resources along the Mid-Atlantic coast, using a "Smart for the Start" approach designed to expedite the siting process while incorporating strong environmental protections. […]
  • Experts Predict End of Month for Ontario FIT Review Update February 2, 2012
    By late February the renewable energy industry should have direction from the Ontario government on some of the major changes ahead for the province’s landmark feed-in tariff program. “I am hoping we will have an announcement then with the megawatt (MW) targets and pricing, then new rules and contracts in March, and application processi […]
  • If Solar is Contagious, Can Utilities Help Spread the Bug? February 2, 2012
    You may have heard it before, but it is worth mentioning again: In residential communities, solar is contagious. But a recent study, "Peer Effects in the Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Panels," conducted by Bryan Bollinger of the NYU Stern School of Business and Kenneth Gillingham of the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, publish […]
  • Executive Roundtable: The Future of Utility-Scale Renewables February 2, 2012
    Renewable energy in the United States is at a crossroads. With several federal tax grants set to expire by the end of 2012, utilities are trying to decide if the falling prices of solar and wind technology makes renewable energy competitive enough to invest in despite vanishing federal aid. […]
  • Understanding Wind Farm Exposures and Managing Risk February 2, 2012
    Wind energy is becoming one of the most widely used sources of renewable energy. In fact, according to the American Wind Energy Association, the wind energy industry has added more than 35 percent of all the new power generating capacity since 2007. As the industry grows in popularity, new developers continue to enter the market, and existing developers may […]

Can fuel cells power the future?

home brewed solar energy systems for powering homes and plug in cars
Alan Boyle writes:An electricity-generating fuel-cell system known as the Bloom Box sparked a huge buzz in the energy debate six months ago – and since then, still more ventures have surfaced to promise better living through chemistry. Will future fuel cells make good on those promises? We should know in the next couple of years.

One of the concepts, detailed today at an American Chemical Society meeting in Boston, combines the environmental friendliness of solar power with the 24/7 capability of fuel-cell generation. When the sun shines, electricity from solar panels would feed into a personal power grid, and also split water into hydrogen and oxygen. When the sun isn’t out, the hydrogen and oxygen can be recombined to keep the electricity flowing, producing pure water in the process.

“Our goal is to make each home its own power system,” Daniel Nocera, a chemist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, explained in a news release discussing the system. “We’re working toward development of ‘personalized’ energy units that can be manufactured, distributed and installed inexpensively. There certainly are major obstacles to be overcome – existing fuel cells and solar cells must be improved, for instance. Nevertheless, one can envision villages in India and Africa not long from now purchasing an affordable basic system.”

Nocera and his colleagues started out with the water-splitting side of the equation. They found a more efficient way to convert H2O into hydrogen and oxygen, using relatively inexpensive catalysts that contain cobalt and nickel. And it doesn’t need to be pure H2O. “Owing to the self-healing properties of the catalysts, these electrolyzers can use any water source,” including seawater, waste water or water from the Charles River in Boston, the researchers say.

They contend that their system eliminates the need for expensive platinum catalysts – which would make the economics of fuel cells much more attractive. Prototype water-splitting systems have been built at a cost of $30 each, operating at power levels of 100 watts. The ACS news release says the catalytic system has been licensed to Sun Catalytix, an MIT commercial spin-off, and the venture aims to make super-efficient electrolyzers available for homes and small businesses within two years.

As Nocera noted, the big issues surrounding this system have to do with the costs for the other components: Putting solar panels on your home could cost tens of thousands of dollars, although government subsidies can reduce the price dramatically. In order to get Nocera’s make-it-yourself electricity system out to villages in the developing world, the devices to turn the hydrogen into energy would also have to become cheaper and more efficient.

The Bloom Box is just one of the devices that has generated excitement among energy experts. It’s generated electricity as well, in pilot projects at places ranging from eBay to Safeway. Bloom Energy’s 100-kilowatt “server” converts natural gas and air into electricity, producing water and carbon dioxide in the process (CH4+2O2 is turned into 2H2O+CO2).

There are still a couple of worrisome factors about that equation, however: First, the Bloom Box is powered by natural gas. The energy conversion factor (50 percent efficiency or better) compares with the best rates for gas-fired power plants, but it’s still a fossil fuel. There are still carbon dioxide emissions as well, although the carbon footprint is not as great as it would be for a gas-fired plant.

Wyoming-based NDCPower is working on a different approach: It’s developing fuel cells that could take in biofuels – say, ethanol, methanol, butanol or even biodiesel that’s converted to alcohol – and produce chemicals with industrial applications on the other side, along with the electricity.

“Our technology is the only existing technology that allows you to take a carbon-based fuel and make energy, and produce no CO2,” the company’s president and chief executive officer, Don Montgomery, told me during a recent sitdown.

The byproducts could range from acetic acid (which is used to make plastics and currently costs $400 a ton or more) to formic acid (a silage preservative that’s even more expensive). Montgomery figures that the sale of chemicals produced by the NDCPower fuel cells, plus the no-CO2 angle, could win them some extra attention in the developing fuel-cell marketplace.

The key is in the chemicals used to make the fuel conversion – a recipe that Montgomery and his colleagues aren’t talking publicly about, except in the broadest terms. “You basically take your ethanol and pour it into Dran-O,” he joked. Dan Buttry, a chemistry professor at Arizona State University who also serves as NDCPower’s chief technology officer, would say only that the secret ingredient is “not platinum.”

Buttry also told me that the NDCPower fuel cell doesn’t need a membrane – which is a plus, because in most fuel cells, the membrane “is a pretty big component of the cost.”

Right now, NDCPower’s main business is providing military-grade power systems to the, um, U.S. military. But the company is aiming to make its mark in the civilian power market as well. And that market is just getting revved up. “The development curve has been like stepping on a rocket ship,” Montgomery told me.

Fuel-cell technology isn’t quite ready to reach orbit yet, and there are some big questions yet to be answered: Will the increased efficiency make up for the higher cost of fuel-cell devices? What’s the right scale for fuel cells? Will we want to have a fuel cell in every garage (or in every hand, or every pacemaker), or does it make more sense to have big fuel-cell “servers” in office buildings or next-generation power plants? What’ll it take to get to the vision of a “power plant in every home,” as sketched out today by MIT’s Nocera.

source from: http://www.msnbc.msn.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter

136 comments to Can fuel cells power the future?

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>